Download Why Control Sets are Problematic in E-DiscoveryBy Dr. Jeremy Pickens

And Why Continuous Active Learning Makes Them Irrelevant

In his blog post “Predictive Coding 3.0,” Ralph Losey lays out a case for the abolishment of control sets in e-discovery, particularly if one is following a continuous learning protocol. Here at Catalyst, we could not agree more with this position. From the very first moment we rolled out our TAR 2.0, continuous learning engine, we have not only recommended against the use of control sets, but we actively decided against ever implementing them in the first place and thus never even had the potential of steering clients awry.

Losey points out three main flaws with control sets. These may be summarized as (1) knowledge issues, (2) sequential testing bias and (3) representativeness. In this piece, I offer my own take and evidence in favor of these three points, and offer a fourth difficulty with control sets: rolling collection.

Read Full Article >>

 

Contact

Phone: 303.824.0900 | Toll Free: 877.557.4273
Fax: 303.293.9073

info@catalystsecure.com
Privacy Policy | Privacy Shield

About

OpenText™, The Information Company, is a market leader in Enterprise Information Management software and solutions, enabling Intelligent and Connected Enterprises by managing, leveraging, securing and gaining insight into enterprise information, on-premises or in the cloud. OpenText™ Catalyst designs, hosts and supports the world’s fastest and most powerful document repositories for large-scale discovery and regulatory compliance. For more than 20 years, global corporations and their counsel have relied on Catalyst to help reduce litigation costs and take control of complex legal matters.

Copyright © 2019 Catalyst Repository Systems. All Rights Reserved.