A recent survey of chief legal officers suggests that there is a wide gap between the reporting they need in order to more efficiently manage their litigation costs and the reporting they actually get.
In the 2016 Chief Legal Officer Survey recently published by the management consulting firm Altman Weil, CLOs say that the number one tactic they can use to control costs is improving efficiency, and that one of the top ways they can improve efficiency is by leveraging technology tools to better collect and analyze management metrics. Continue reading
Catalyst is teaming up with Bloomberg Law’s Big Law Business to present a complimentary live event in Chicago later this month on how legal departments can successfully manage costs while staying compliant.
The Feb. 23 event features a keynote interview with Susan Lees, general counsel of Allstate Insurance, conducted by Gabe Friedman, editorial manager, Bloomberg BNA. Lees is known as an innovative GC who has effectively led her legal department in controlling costs and increasing risk management. She is expected to discuss how her department uses technology to lower costs while improving transparency and defensibility. Continue reading
I am almost reluctant to tell you that Catalyst’s new e-discovery platform for corporations, Insight Enterprise, will cut your discovery costs. After all, doesn’t every e-discovery company say that? Having just returned from Legaltech in New York, I can tell you that companies so frequently claim to cut costs that the promise begins to ring hollow. So, when Catalyst says it, why should you believe any different?
The answer, in part, is that Insight Enterprise Continue reading
Earlier this month, Catalyst launched a new product designed exclusively for corporate e-discovery, Insight Enterprise. We’ve been telling you about its features in a series of blog posts. Now is your chance to see it first hand, if you will be attending Legaltech in New York next week.
Throughout the conference, Catalyst staff will be on site in the exhibit hall, demonstrating Insight Enterprise and other Continue reading
“To complicate is easy. To simplify is difficult,” said the Italian industrial designer Bruno Munari.
If Munari’s words were a challenge, Catalyst accepted. Last year, Catalyst assembled a team of designers, engineers and legal professionals to build a platform with the overarching goal of simplifying corporate e-discovery.
Two weeks ago, Catalyst unveiled that platform, Insight Enterprise. And in a 12-week series of blog posts, we are focusing in each week on particular aspects of Insight Enterprise and exploring them in more depth. This week, our subject is simplification – how this new platform simplifies corporate e-discovery for in-house counsel. Continue reading
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. That old saw makes perfect sense. But sometimes seeing when something is “broke” depends on your perspective.
Take corporate litigation and e-discovery.
From the perspective of outside counsel, there ain’t nothin’ broke that needs fixin’. Litigators have always handled their cases the same way – each case as a distinct project. They start from scratch when the case comes in and close it forever when the case concludes. This siloed by-the-case approach has characterized litigation for as long as there have been judicial tribunals. Continue reading
Seems every story or survey you read about corporate counsel these days talks about the urgency for legal departments to rein in litigation costs and enhance operational efficiency. And any conversation about reining in litigation costs invariably turns to e-discovery. Estimates say litigation costs make up 60 percent of legal department budgets, and e-discovery accounts for 60 percent of those litigation expenses.
Often, however, controlling litigation costs is much easier said than done. The reason is that e-discovery is traditionally conducted in silos. At any given time, a corporation may have multiple ongoing legal matters – lawsuits, arbitrations, investigations and other proceedings – all requiring e-discovery of one form or another. Handling those various matters are likely to be a variety of outside law firms and supporting them are likely to be a variety of outside vendors and consultants. Continue reading
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect Dec. 1. Do you know how they impact e-discovery?
A year ago at this time, the 2015 FRCP amendments were the talk of the e-discovery community. The revisions relating to discovery were substantial and, in some cases, controversial. But this year’s amendments took effect virtually unnoticed.
That is because this year’s amendments were few in number and minor in effect. However, there is one change that directly affects discovery practice: FRCP Rule 6(d) has been amended to remove service by electronic means from the types of service that give a party an extra three days to respond. Continue reading
Webinar Will Explore How Corporate Counsel Can Better Monitor Their E-Discovery Spend.
For corporate counsel, cost pressures are a primary concern, but many have difficulty putting a precise number on their discovery spend. In fact, a 2016 Altman Weil survey of 336 chief legal officers found that while 39 percent of law departments report collecting and analyzing management metrics to improve efficiency, only 6.6 percent say they get real value from those efforts. Continue reading
The number of law firms involved in cases requiring e-discovery rose in 2016, but many of those firms are failing to use advanced e-discovery technologies or even any e-discovery technology.
These are among the findings of the recently released 2016 Legal Technology Survey Report conducted by the American Bar Association’s Legal Technology Resource Center. The survey examines legal technology usage in a number of areas of law practice, including e-discovery. Continue reading